Hoell v. Blanchard

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Hoell v. Blanchard

4 S.C. Eq. 21

DecidedFebruary 15, 1809

StatusPublished

This text of 4 S.C. Eq. 21 (Hoell v. Blanchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoell v. Blanchard, 4 S.C. Eq. 21 (S.C. Ct. App. 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

There is complete and adequate remedy at law. Tbe court Will not support a bill against securities in an administration bond, till a right has been established against the principal or administrator. Let any party [26]*26interested bring a suit against the administrator, anti establish a debt against him at law, or in equity, and then a suit may be brought at law on the bond, against the sureties, who would then be made liable, not before.' — ■- The court after the argument, affirmed the decree of the circuit court.

Yancey, for complainant — Calhoun, for defendant*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There is complete and adequate remedy at law. Tbe court Will not support a bill against securities in an administration bond, till a right has been established against the principal or administrator. Let any party [26]*26interested bring a suit against the administrator, anti establish a debt against him at law, or in equity, and then a suit may be brought at law on the bond, against the sureties, who would then be made liable, not before.' — ■- The court after the argument, affirmed the decree of the circuit court.

Yancey, for complainant — Calhoun, for defendant*

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 S.C. Eq. 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoell-v-blanchard-scctapp-1809.