Hoeing v. Global Products International, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hoeing v. Global Products International, Inc.

400 S.W.3d 868, 2013 WL 2643828, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 703

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 2013·No. No. ED 98866·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Sara K. Hoeing, appeals from the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits.

The judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Sara K. Hoeing, appeals from the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits.

The judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hoeing v. Global Products International, Inc., 400 S.W.3d 868, 2013 WL 2643828, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 703 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

400 S.W.3d 868 (Hoeing v. Global Products International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.