Hoeg v. Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
This text of 324 N.W.2d 377 (Hoeg v. Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kenneth and Marjean Hoeg purchased a home and placed a mortgage on the property with Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Association. The mortgage contained a due on sale clause. The Hoegs desired to sell the property and were informed by Twin City Federal that the mortgage could not be assumed. The Hoegs brought a declaratory judgment action. The trial court, relying on our decision in Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Association of Minneapolis, 308 N.W.2d 471 (Minn.1981), properly concluded that the due on sale clause was unenforceable. Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court held that the federal regulation which vali[378]*378dates due on sale clauses for federal savings institutions preempts state law. See Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Association v. de la Cuesta,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 3014, 3025, 73 L.Ed.2d 664 (1982).
Based on the Fidelity decision, we are compelled to reverse the decision of the trial court.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 N.W.2d 377, 1982 Minn. LEXIS 1788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoeg-v-twin-city-federal-savings-loan-assn-minn-1982.