Hoeg Corp. v. Peebles Corp.

95 N.E.3d 325, 72 N.Y.S.3d 23, 31 N.Y.3d 926
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedMarch 27, 2018
Docket2018–126
StatusPublished

This text of 95 N.E.3d 325 (Hoeg Corp. v. Peebles Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoeg Corp. v. Peebles Corp., 95 N.E.3d 325, 72 N.Y.S.3d 23, 31 N.Y.3d 926 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513[b] ; Eaton v. State of New York, 76 N.Y.2d 824, 559 N.Y.S.2d 981, 559 N.E.2d 675 [1990] ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
Stafford v. Bickford
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.E.3d 325, 72 N.Y.S.3d 23, 31 N.Y.3d 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoeg-corp-v-peebles-corp-nycterr-2018.