Hoefler & Stoecklein Co. v. Pioneer Buildings of Ohio, Inc.
105 N.E.2d 467, 61 Ohio Law. Abs. 448, 1950 Ohio App. LEXIS 862
Opinion
[449] OPINION
Submitted on motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no bill of exceptions, assignments of error or briefs-had been filed in accordance with Rule VII. Rule VII has no application to appeals on law and fact. Appeals on law and fact are controlled by Rule V.
Motion to dismiss is hereby overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoefler & Stoecklein Co. v. Pioneer Buildings of Ohio, Inc., 105 N.E.2d 467, 61 Ohio Law. Abs. 448, 1950 Ohio App. LEXIS 862 (Ohio Ct. App. 1950).
105 N.E.2d 467 (Hoefler & Stoecklein Co. v. Pioneer Buildings of Ohio, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estes v. Hancock County Bank
289 N.E.2d 728 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1972)