Hoefer v. Hoefer

643 So. 2d 631, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8462, 1994 WL 460730
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 1994·No. No. 94-620·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s in personam jurisdiction argument fails because it was not timely asserted, Notarfonzo v. Kline, 464 So.2d 656, 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), review denied, 472 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1985), and, in the absence of a record of the evidentiary hearing below, there is no basis to reverse the appealed order. On its face, it is legally sufficient.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoefer v. Hoefer, 643 So. 2d 631, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8462, 1994 WL 460730 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

643 So. 2d 631 (Hoefer v. Hoefer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Notarfonzo v. Kline
464 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)