Hodson v. Seligman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hodson v. Seligman

263 A.D. 984, 34 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7734

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 1942·Published

Opinion

Under the circumstances disclosed in the record, a payment of twelve dollars a week by defendant-appellant to the complainant-respondent should be deemed sufficient. Order unanimously modified by reducing the sum of fifteen dollars awarded to the sum of twelve dollars per week, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present- — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; O’Malley, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Under the circumstances disclosed in the record, a payment of twelve dollars a week by defendant-appellant to the complainant-respondent should be deemed sufficient. Order unanimously modified by reducing the sum of fifteen dollars awarded to the sum of twelve dollars per week, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present- — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; O’Malley, J., taking no part.

Hodson v. Seligman, 263 A.D. 984, 34 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

263 A.D. 984 (Hodson v. Seligman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.