Hodroff v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Opinion

Matthew HODROFF, Case No.: 25-cv-0041-AGS-JLB Plant | ORDER REMANDING CASE TO V- STATE COURT JEPMORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., Defendants. This Court previously dismissed plaintiff Matthew Hodroff’s sole federal claim and gave him until June 9, 2025, to amend his complaint. (See ECF 11.) Hodroff has not filed amended complaint, and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). “In the usual case in which all federal-law claims eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine—judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity—will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.” Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc., 625 F.3d 550, 561 (9th Cir. 2010). This case is thus REMANDED to Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Central Division, Case No. 24CL025842C. (See ECF 1, at 14); 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Dated: June 10, 2025

Hon. Andrew G. Schopler United States District Judge