Hodo v. Serrecchia

102 A.D.2d 807, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18968
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to punish for contempt and for counsel fees denied, without costs. The direction in the order of this court, entered on April 19,1984 (100 AD2d 807), to plaintiffs to pay two thirds of the maintenance and carrying charges was merely a condition of their remaining in the apartment. Failure to pay is not contempt, but a violation of the condition, permitting defendant Serrecchia to apply for appropriate relief, e.g., a money judgment, or eviction, or both, as said defendant may be advised. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Silverman and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodo v. Serrecchia, 102 A.D.2d 807, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

102 A.D.2d 807 (Hodo v. Serrecchia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rose Associates v. Johnson
247 A.D.2d 222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)