Hodgson v. State of Minnesota

835 F.2d 1545
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 13, 1987
Docket86-5423
StatusPublished

This text of 835 F.2d 1545 (Hodgson v. State of Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodgson v. State of Minnesota, 835 F.2d 1545 (8th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

835 F.2d 1545

Jane HODGSON, M.D.; Arthur Horowitz, M.D.; Nadine T.,
Janet T., Ellen Z., Heather P., Mary J., Sharon L., Kathy
M., and Judy M., individually and on behalf of all other
persons similarly situated; Diane P., Sarah L. and Jackie
H.; Meadowbrook Women's Clinic, P.A., Planned Parenthood of
Minnesota, a nonprofit Minnesota corporation; Midwest
Health Center for Women, P.A., a nonprofit Minnesota
corporation; Women's Health Center of Duluth, a nonprofit
Minnesota corporation, Appellees,
v.
The STATE OF MINNESOTA; Rudy Perpich as Governor of the
State of Minnesota; Hubert H. Humphrey, III, as
Attorney General of the State of
Minnesota, Appellants.

Nos. 86-5423, 86-5431.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 9, 1987.
Decided Nov. 13, 1987.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, HEANEY, Circuit Judge, and ROSENN,* Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing by the panel is granted and the opinion of this court previously filed, 827 F.2d 1191 (8th Cir.1987), together with the judgment entered in accordance with it, is vacated and withdrawn. This case will be held in abeyance pending a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Hartigan v. Zbaraz, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 267, 93 L.Ed.2d 245 (1987). In view of the above order the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

SO ORDERED.

*

The HONORABLE MAX ROSENN, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Copple
827 F.2d 1182 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)
Hodgson v. Minnesota
835 F.2d 1545 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 F.2d 1545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgson-v-state-of-minnesota-ca8-1987.