Hodgson v. Randall

402 U.S. 967, 91 S. Ct. 1656
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 17, 1971
DocketNo. 728
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 402 U.S. 967 (Hodgson v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodgson v. Randall, 402 U.S. 967, 91 S. Ct. 1656 (1971).

Opinion

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Minn.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and case set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garrett v. Hoffman
441 F. Supp. 1151 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
Nyberg v. City of Virginia
361 F. Supp. 932 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Princeton, NJ v. Kugler
342 F. Supp. 1048 (D. New Jersey, 1972)
LAKE CARRIERS'ASSOCIATION v. MacMullan
336 F. Supp. 248 (E.D. Michigan, 1971)
Planned Parenthood Association v. Nelson
327 F. Supp. 1290 (D. Arizona, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 U.S. 967, 91 S. Ct. 1656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgson-v-randall-scotus-1971.