Hodgson v. Hardy

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Hodgson v. Hardy

42 P. 930, 3 Kan. App. 418, 1895 Kan. App. LEXIS 297

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kansas

DecidedDecember 7, 1895

DocketNo. 61

StatusPublished

This text of 42 P. 930 (Hodgson v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hodgson v. Hardy, 42 P. 930, 3 Kan. App. 418, 1895 Kan. App. LEXIS 297 (kanctapp 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This was an action instituted in the district court of Kingman county, Kansas, by Charles B. Hardy against R. W. Hodgson to recover on an appeal bond. The same facts exist in this case as in the case of R. W. Hodgson against Robert E. MoKinstrey, just decided by this court, and the decision in that case is decisive of this.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case remanded to the district court, with directions that that court set aside the judgment and grant a new trial, and overrule the demurrer of the plaintiff below to the answer of the defendant.

All the Judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This was an action instituted in the district court of Kingman county, Kansas, by Charles B. Hardy against R. W. Hodgson to recover on an appeal bond. The same facts exist in this case as in the case of R. W. Hodgson against Robert E. MoKinstrey, just decided by this court, and the decision in that case is decisive of this.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case remanded to the district court, with directions that that court set aside the judgment and grant a new trial, and overrule the demurrer of the plaintiff below to the answer of the defendant.

All the Judges concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 P. 930, 3 Kan. App. 418, 1895 Kan. App. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgson-v-hardy-kanctapp-1895.