Hodgson v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of 39 F. App'x 928 (Hodgson v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronald W. Hodgson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to uphold the Commissioner’s decision denying Hodgson’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hodgson v. Commissioner, No. CA-00-94-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 F. App'x 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgson-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca4-2002.