Home/Supreme Court/Hodgson & Thompson v. Bowerbank

Hodgson & Thompson v. Bowerbank

9 U.S. 303, 3 L. Ed. 108, 5 Cranch 303, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 437
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 1, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by69 cases

This text of 9 U.S. 303 (Hodgson & Thompson v. Bowerbank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodgson & Thompson v. Bowerbank, 9 U.S. 303, 3 L. Ed. 108, 5 Cranch 303, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 437 (1809).

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.

Turn to the article of'the constitution of the United States, for the statute cannot extend the jurisdiction beyond the limits of the constitution.

(The words of the constitution were found to be “ between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens, or subjects.”)

The court said the objection was fatal.

The record was afterwards amended by consent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chenco Engineering & Consulting GMBH v. Do-Fluoride New Materials Co. LTD
D. Idaho, 2025
Lopez v. Vega
D. New Mexico, 2025
Alexanian v. FCA US, LLC
S.D. California, 2020
BARRETT v. TRI-COAST PHARMACY, INC.
D. New Jersey, 2019
United States v. Tyrone Davis
825 F.3d 1014 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Flextronics International USA, Inc. v. Sparkling Drink Systems Innovation Center Ltd.
186 F. Supp. 3d 852 (N.D. Illinois, 2016)
Matao Yokeno v. Sawako Sekiguchi
754 F.3d 649 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
H.K. Huilin International Trade Co. v. Kevin Multiline Polymer Inc.
907 F. Supp. 2d 284 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Perry v. Gonzales
472 F. Supp. 2d 623 (D. New Jersey, 2007)
Van Der Steen v. Sygen International, PLC
464 F. Supp. 2d 931 (N.D. California, 2006)
Intec USA v. Engle, Jonathan
467 F.3d 1038 (Seventh Circuit, 2006)
Al Odah, Khaled A.F. v. United States
321 F.3d 1134 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)
Zenith Electronics Corp. v. Kimball International Manufacturing, Inc.
114 F. Supp. 2d 764 (N.D. Illinois, 2000)
Hideo Matsuda v. Michiko Wada
128 F. Supp. 2d 659 (D. Hawaii, 2000)
Lee v. Trans American Trucking Service, Inc.
111 F. Supp. 2d 135 (E.D. New York, 1999)
Axel Johnson, Inc. v. Carroll Carolina Oil Co.
145 F.3d 660 (Fourth Circuit, 1998)
Axel Johnson, Incorporated v. Carroll Carolina Oil Company, Incorporated
145 F.3d 660 (Fourth Circuit, 1998)
Matimak Trading Co. v. Albert Khalily, D/B/A Unitex Mills, Inc., and D.A.Y. Kids Sportswear Inc.
118 F.3d 76 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Rafic Saadeh v. Fawaz Farouki
107 F.3d 52 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
Paolo Lo Duca v. United States
93 F.3d 1100 (Second Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 U.S. 303, 3 L. Ed. 108, 5 Cranch 303, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgson-thompson-v-bowerbank-scotus-1809.