Hodgman v. Concord

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Hodgman v. Concord

41 A. 287, 69 N.H. 349

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pike, J.

The injury for which the plaintiff seeks damages was complete when the change of grade was made,, and he was then entitled to compensation for the defendants’ act. His right of > action was not affected by the conveyance ©f the premises *350 Boynton v. Railroad, 4 Cush. 467, 469; Moore v. Boston, 8 Cush. 274; New York & New England R. R. v. Drury, 133 Mass. 167, 169; Bean v. Warner, 38 N. H. 247.

Exception overruled.

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pike, J.

The injury for which the plaintiff seeks damages was complete when the change of grade was made,, and he was then entitled to compensation for the defendants’ act. His right of > action was not affected by the conveyance ©f the premises *350 Boynton v. Railroad, 4 Cush. 467, 469; Moore v. Boston, 8 Cush. 274; New York & New England R. R. v. Drury, 133 Mass. 167, 169; Bean v. Warner, 38 N. H. 247.

Exception overruled.

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Hodgman v. Concord, 41 A. 287, 69 N.H. 349 (N.H. 1898).

Pincite

41 A. 287 (Hodgman v. Concord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related