Hodgman v. Concord

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Hodgman v. Concord

41 A. 287, 69 N.H. 349

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 A. 287 (Hodgman v. Concord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hodgman v. Concord, 41 A. 287, 69 N.H. 349 (N.H. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Pike, J.

The injury for which the plaintiff seeks damages was complete when the change of grade was made,, and he was then entitled to compensation for the defendants’ act. His right of > action was not affected by the conveyance ©f the premises *350 Boynton v. Railroad, 4 Cush. 467, 469; Moore v. Boston, 8 Cush. 274; New York & New England R. R. v. Drury, 133 Mass. 167, 169; Bean v. Warner, 38 N. H. 247.

Exception overruled.

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pike, J.

The injury for which the plaintiff seeks damages was complete when the change of grade was made,, and he was then entitled to compensation for the defendants’ act. His right of > action was not affected by the conveyance ©f the premises *350 Boynton v. Railroad, 4 Cush. 467, 469; Moore v. Boston, 8 Cush. 274; New York & New England R. R. v. Drury, 133 Mass. 167, 169; Bean v. Warner, 38 N. H. 247.

Exception overruled.

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A. 287, 69 N.H. 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgman-v-concord-nh-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack