Hodgman v. Barker

16 N.Y.S. 76, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 773, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 320
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 16, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

The disposition of the case of Bank v. Same Defendant, 16 N. Y. Supp. 75, seems to dispose of this appeal. Notwithstanding the weakness of the papers upon which the plaintiff’s attachment was granted, the appellant cannot succeed upon this appeal, because of the fact, of which this court must take judicial notice, that its attachment has been set aside upon motion of the defendant because of the insufficiency of the papers upon which it was granted, and is therefore no longer in a position to assert any claim to the property upon which the attachment in this action had been levied. We think, therefore, that the appeal must be dismissed, but without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodgman v. Barker, 16 N.Y.S. 76, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 773, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 320 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

16 N.Y.S. 76 (Hodgman v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stutsman v. Earles
122 N.E. 355 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1919)