Hodgkiss, Ronald Joseph
This text of Hodgkiss, Ronald Joseph (Hodgkiss, Ronald Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. WR-88,151-01
EX PARTE RONALD JOSEPH HODGKISS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W296-80640-2012-HC IN THE 199TH DISTRICT COURT FROM COLLIN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of
sexual assault and five counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to twenty years’
imprisonment on the sexual assault charge and four of the indecency counts and sentenced to ten
years’ imprisonment on one of the indecency counts. He did not appeal his convictions.
Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and he was given ineffective assistance of
counsel. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.
1999). The trial court recommended denying relief based, in part, on the reporter’s record from the
habeas hearing. The reporter’s record from that hearing was not provided to this Court. In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.
The trial court shall provide this Court with the reporter’s record of the habeas hearing upon
which it based its findings of fact. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and
conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
habeas corpus relief, if necessary.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the
order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be
obtained from this Court.
Filed: March 28, 2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hodgkiss, Ronald Joseph, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgkiss-ronald-joseph-texcrimapp-2018.