Hodges, William Virgil
This text of Hodges, William Virgil (Hodges, William Virgil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-76,096-01
EX PARTE WILLIAM VIRGIL HODGES, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1228167 IN THE 230 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of felony driving
while intoxicated (DWI) and was sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his
conviction.
In his -01 application, the Applicant alleged, inter alia, that his sentence was illegal because
his previous 1984 “conviction” was not available for enhancement purposes because his probation 2
had never been revoked.1 This Court denied relief, based upon the trial court’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law, on July 20, 2011.
We now withdraw our prior decision and reconsider the -01 application on our own motion.
After reconsideration, we find that the Applicant’s prior offense was committed on or about
December 30, 1983, the Applicant successfully completed his probation in that case, and that the
Applicant had no other prior DWI convictions other than those listed in the indictment. Therefore,
the Applicant’s sentence in this case is outside of the punishment range allowed for a Class A
misdemeanor.
Applicant is entitled to relief. State v. Wilson, 324 S.W.3d 595 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex
parte Sparks, 206 S.W.3d 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause
No. 1228167 in the 230th Judicial District Court of Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is
remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to answer the charges set out in the
indictment.2 The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate
of this Court issues.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: December 18, 2013 Do Not Publish
1 Ground number two in the -01 application alleged that there was an issue with Applicant’s 1984 DWI conviction in Cause No. 747965 in the County Criminal Court at Law No. 7 of Harris County, Texas. However, the indictment in this case reflects that conviction was from August 15, 1986. The Applicant does not allege any error concerning the other prior DWI conviction set out in the indictment. 2 The Applicant’s -03 and -04 applications are dismissed as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hodges, William Virgil, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-william-virgil-texcrimapp-2013.