Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
David Laurence Hodges, Case No. 20-cv-0090 (WMW/KMM)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION
State of Minnesota Department of Corrections et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the October 23, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Dkt. 100.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The October 23, 2020 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 100), is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff David Laurence Hodges’s motion for a preliminary injunction, (Dkt. 50), is DENIED.
Dated: November 23, 2020 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright v Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections (Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.