Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hodges v. State

Hodges v. State

191 S.E. 182, 55 Ga. App. 670, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 444
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 7, 1937·No. 26092·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Guerry, J.

1. An indictment which in the language of the Code charges the offense of maintaining and operating a lottery, and specifies or names the kind of lottery being operated, is sufficient, and is good as against demurrer. Kolshorn v. State, 97 Ga. 343 (23 S. E. 829); Guthas v. State, 54 Ga. App. 217 (187 S. E. 847); Roberts v. State, 54 Ga. App. 704 (188 S. E. 844).

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. After a' careful consideration of the assignments of error in respect to admission of certain evidence, we find no such error as would require a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges v. State, 191 S.E. 182, 55 Ga. App. 670, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 444 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

191 S.E. 182 (Hodges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodges v. State
104 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Clay v. State
95 S.E.2d 471 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Howard v. State
78 S.E.2d 876 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Ramsey v. State
69 S.E.2d 98 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
President v. State
64 S.E.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)