Hodges v. State
645 So. 2d 115, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10838, 1994 WL 627378
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hodges v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 So. 2d 481 →
Opinion
We affirm Bobby Hodges’ convictions; however, we must vacate Hodges’ sentences [116]*116on the authority of State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994). Because the trial court did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, on remand, the court can impose a departure sentence as long as proper contemporaneous written reasons are provided. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1989).
Convictions AFFIRMED; sentences VACATED and cause REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hodges v. State, 645 So. 2d 115, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10838, 1994 WL 627378 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
645 So. 2d 115 (Hodges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Davis
630 So. 2d 1059 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
State v. Betancourt
552 So. 2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)