Hodges v. Short

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hodges v. Short

225 So. 2d 40, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 6090

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 27, 1969·No. No. 2776·Published

Opinion

MILLER, Judge.

This is a companion appeal to that presented in Linceum v. Short, 225 So.2d 38 (rendered this date). For the reasons set forth by our opinion there, we affirm the trial court’s decision sustaining the summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Accordingly the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are to be paid by plaintiff-appellant.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLER, Judge.

This is a companion appeal to that presented in Linceum v. Short, 225 So.2d 38 (rendered this date). For the reasons set forth by our opinion there, we affirm the trial court’s decision sustaining the summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Accordingly the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are to be paid by plaintiff-appellant.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Hodges v. Short, 225 So. 2d 40, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 6090 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

225 So. 2d 40 (Hodges v. Short) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related