Hodges v. Russell

Indiana Supreme Court

Hodges v. Russell

15 Ind. 222, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 368

DecidedDecember 7, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ind. 222 (Hodges v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hodges v. Russell, 15 Ind. 222, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 368 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Objection is taken to the ruling of the Court on demurrers. Ho exception was taken. Other objections [223]*223relate to the weight of the evidence and the judgment of the Court thereon, on the motion for a new trial. There is no bill of exceptions purporting to contain all the evidence, as required by the rule of this Court.

J. JR. M. Byrant, H. W. Olíase and J. A. Wilstaoh, for appellants. JMJ. JMJ. Milford and Z. Baird, for appellees.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Objection is taken to the ruling of the Court on demurrers. Ho exception was taken. Other objections [223]*223relate to the weight of the evidence and the judgment of the Court thereon, on the motion for a new trial. There is no bill of exceptions purporting to contain all the evidence, as required by the rule of this Court.

J. JR. M. Byrant, H. W. Olíase and J. A. Wilstaoh, for appellants. JMJ. JMJ. Milford and Z. Baird, for appellees.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ind. 222, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-russell-ind-1860.