Hodges v. Percival

Appellate Court of Illinois

Hodges v. Percival

33 Ill. App. 25, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 441

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 17, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Ill. App. 25 (Hodges v. Percival) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hodges v. Percival, 33 Ill. App. 25, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 441 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of $1,500, in favor of appellee and against appellant, for the injury received by the falling of an elevator in appellant’s building.

The questions are almost identical with those made in the case of Hodges v. Bearse, decided at the October term of this court and now pending in the Supreme Court, the appellee in that case and appellee in this having been both injured by the same accident. It would be entirely useless for us to state the case and the questions made. We have examined the record and find that the evidence clearly supports the verdict, and there is, in our opinion, no error of Jaw. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Gary, J., takes no part in this case in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of $1,500, in favor of appellee and against appellant, for the injury received by the falling of an elevator in appellant’s building.

The questions are almost identical with those made in the case of Hodges v. Bearse, decided at the October term of this court and now pending in the Supreme Court, the appellee in that case and appellee in this having been both injured by the same accident. It would be entirely useless for us to state the case and the questions made. We have examined the record and find that the evidence clearly supports the verdict, and there is, in our opinion, no error of Jaw. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Gary, J., takes no part in this case in this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Ill. App. 25, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-percival-illappct-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack