Hodges v. P.C. Richard & Son Service Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hodges v. P.C. Richard & Son Service Co.

59 A.D.3d 679, 873 N.Y.S.2d 490

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 2009·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), entered April 7, 2008, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint and denied his cross motion to dismiss the defendants’ affirmative defense that the action is barred by the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint (see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553 [1991]; Roberson v Moveway Transfer & Stor., 44 AD3d 839 [2007]; Ugijanin v 2 W. 45th St. Joint Venture, 43 AD3d 911 [2007]; Bailey v Montefiore Med. Ctr., 12 AD3d 545 [2004]; Causewell v Barnes & Noble Bookstores, 238 AD2d 536 [1997]).

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Eng, JJ., concur. [See 2008 NY Slip Op 31036(11).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), entered April 7, 2008, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint and denied his cross motion to dismiss the defendants’ affirmative defense that the action is barred by the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint (see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553 [1991]; Roberson v Moveway Transfer & Stor., 44 AD3d 839 [2007]; Ugijanin v 2 W. 45th St. Joint Venture, 43 AD3d 911 [2007]; Bailey v Montefiore Med. Ctr., 12 AD3d 545 [2004]; Causewell v Barnes & Noble Bookstores, 238 AD2d 536 [1997]).

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Eng, JJ., concur. [See 2008 NY Slip Op 31036(11).]

Hodges v. P.C. Richard & Son Service Co., 59 A.D.3d 679, 873 N.Y.S.2d 490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

59 A.D.3d 679 (Hodges v. P.C. Richard & Son Service Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related