Hodges v. Moore
This text of 1 N.C. 150 (Hodges v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Let him throw himself on the justice of the court; and as Parliament stand to their priviledges, so do we to ours. In any case they may restrain the parties or their counsels, but never the court, who are not bound to take notice of it, without special writ. And the parties who prosecute do it at their peril.
Noy said, that in M. 12 E. 4, in the pleas of the Exchequer, there is an excellent precedent, on the learning respecting the priviledge of Parliament: In Marsh’s case, antea, p. 48. Bendl. 184. Noy 83.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-moore-circtnc-1793.