Hodges v. . Jasper

12 N.C. 459
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1828·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The demand of probate must-be dismissed ; for that it should have been made in Chowan Superior Court, as the Court in which the will was established. It was the judgment of that Court, to which the case was regularly removed, that established it, and not the judgment of the Court in which it was first offered for probate; the judgment of the latter was'vacated or annulled by the appeal. It would have been desirable to the Court, that the parties should have agreed between themselves, on some county for the trial of the matter in controversy, to prevent a further accumulation of costs, and we have accordingly advised it to them ; but as they have not accommodated if, we are constrained reluctantly to render the above judgment,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges v. . Jasper, 12 N.C. 459 (N.C. 1828).

12 N.C. 459 (Hodges v. . Jasper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Ardell Hamilton Trigg
368 S.W.3d 483 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2012)
Harper v. . Gray
4 N.C. 416 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1816)
Gerard's Will
3 N.C. 2 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1797)