Hodges v. Hodges
This text of 256 S.E.2d 380 (Hodges v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The jury’s verdict and judgment modifying downward the father’s child support obligation is supported by the evidence and not contrary to law. Kitchin v. Kitchin, 219 Ga. 417 (133 SE2d 880) (1963). The mother’s contention that the father’s testimony was ambiguous involved matters of evidence for cross examination or defense. She introduced no evidence. The mother has failed to show how she was harmed by the admission of the father’s testimony as to his indebtedness rather than the notes themselves under the best evidence rule. We affirm.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 S.E.2d 380, 243 Ga. 700, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-hodges-ga-1979.