Hodges v. Gay

110 S.E.2d 570, 100 Ga. App. 210, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 575
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 21, 1959·No. 37798·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Townsend, Judge.

1. Special grounds of a motion for new trial complaining that the court failed to charge on certain control *211 ling issues in the case, but which neither set forth in substance any pleadings or evidence raising such issues, nor refer' to and identify-the same by page number in the record, are too incomplete for consideration by this'court. Maxwell v. Hollis, 214 Ga. 358 (104 S. E. 2d 893); Kirby v. Whitlock-Dobbs, Inc., 97 Ga. App. 159 (3) (102 S. E. 2d 631); Brewer v. Henson, 96 Ga. App. 501 (100 S. E. 2d 661); Hartsfield v. Hartsfield, 87 Ga. App. 707 (2) (75 S. E. 2d 276).

Decided September 21, 1959. James R. Venable, for plaintiff in error. Zachary & Hunter, W. E. Zachary, John C. Hunter, contra..

2. The general grounds of the motion for new trial, not being argued or insisted upon, are treated as abandoned. ' '

The trial court did not err in denying the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges v. Gay, 110 S.E.2d 570, 100 Ga. App. 210, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 575 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959).

110 S.E.2d 570 (Hodges v. Gay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Troy v. Wright Body Works, Inc.
136 S.E.2d 197 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Fowler v. Aldridge
133 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Mazzola v. Swift Manufacturing Co.
132 S.E.2d 812 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Byck v. Lawton
131 S.E.2d 176 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Fuller v. Self
131 S.E.2d 241 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Porter v. Bennett
127 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Burns v. McLucas
126 S.E.2d 309 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Pendry v. Addison
125 S.E.2d 523 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)