Hodges v. Gay
This text of 110 S.E.2d 570 (Hodges v. Gay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Special grounds of a motion for new trial complaining that the court failed to charge on certain control *211 ling issues in the case, but which neither set forth in substance any pleadings or evidence raising such issues, nor refer' to and identify-the same by page number in the record, are too incomplete for consideration by this'court. Maxwell v. Hollis, 214 Ga. 358 (104 S. E. 2d 893); Kirby v. Whitlock-Dobbs, Inc., 97 Ga. App. 159 (3) (102 S. E. 2d 631); Brewer v. Henson, 96 Ga. App. 501 (100 S. E. 2d 661); Hartsfield v. Hartsfield, 87 Ga. App. 707 (2) (75 S. E. 2d 276).
2. The general grounds of the motion for new trial, not being argued or insisted upon, are treated as abandoned. ' '
The trial court did not err in denying the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 S.E.2d 570, 100 Ga. App. 210, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-gay-gactapp-1959.