Hodges v. Gates
This text of 9 Vt. 178 (Hodges v. Gates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The only question in this case is, whether the defendant was in possession of the demanded premises, in such sense, as to subject him to the action of ejectment. It appears that one Daine was, in fact, in possession, who had previously conveyed his right in the premises to the defendant, with an agreement that he (Daine) should retain the use and occupancy of the-land for one year.
[180]*180It is very clear, that Daine, by this arrangement, became the tenant of Gates, the defendant, and, under our statute, requiring the landlord to be joined with the tenant, an ejectment could not be sustained against Daine alone. It would be absurd to hold, that, under these circumstances, the action would not lie.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Vt. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-gates-vt-1837.