Hodges v. Galt
25 Mass. 251
This text of 25 Mass. 251 (Hodges v. Galt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hodges v. Galt, 25 Mass. 251 (Mass. 1829).
Opinion
The Cowri said that due diligence had not been used on the part of the plaintiff; that he should have put a letter into the post-office directed to Boston, or if he received the defendant’s letter and knew where he was going, he should have sent a notice to Liverpool; but he made no effort to give any notice.1
Plaintiff nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bank of Utica v. Phillips
3 Wend. 408 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)
Bank of Utica v. Davidson
5 Wend. 587 (New York Supreme Court, 1830)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 Mass. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-galt-mass-1829.