Hodges v. Ettinger

188 N.E. 664, 46 Ohio App. 307, 16 Ohio Law. Abs. 192, 1933 Ohio App. LEXIS 584
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1933·Published

Opinions

Boss, J.

This is a proceeding in error from the *308 court of common pleas of Hamilton county, wherein a judgment of the municipal court of Cincinnati in favor of Alvin H. Hodges, the plaintiff in such municipal court, was reversed. The plaintiff sued for damages for breach of contract of employment, the period of the contract not having expired. The defense was a general denial.

In the evidence it developed that the contract was one not to be performed within a year, and was not in writing. The common pleas court reversed a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the municipal court, on the ground that the contract was one within the statute of frauds, Section 8621, General Code.

While there was evidence that the contract had been partly performed, this feature is not available in this action. Ossage v. Foley, 20 Ohio App., 16, 153 N. E., 117.

While actions in quantum meruit have been sustained, the present suit is almost entirely based on the period of the contract unperformed, and is specifically an action for damages for breach of a contract which is within the statute of frauds.

The judgment of the court of common pleas is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Hamilton, P. J., and Cushing, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges v. Ettinger, 188 N.E. 664, 46 Ohio App. 307, 16 Ohio Law. Abs. 192, 1933 Ohio App. LEXIS 584 (Ohio Ct. App. 1933).

188 N.E. 664 (Hodges v. Ettinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ossage v. Foley
153 N.E. 117 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1923)
Parish & Bingham Corp. v. Jackson
16 Ohio App. 51 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1921)