Hodges v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

12 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 996, 1994 WL 6232
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 12, 1994
DocketNos. 91-6037, 91-6070
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 F.3d 426 (Hodges v. Delta Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodges v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 12 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 996, 1994 WL 6232 (5th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
897 F. Supp. 313 (E.D. Texas, 1995)
Jamerson v. Atlantic Southeast Airlines
860 F. Supp. 821 (M.D. Alabama, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 996, 1994 WL 6232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-delta-airlines-inc-ca5-1994.