Hodges v. Cay Economy Plan, Inc.
This text of 130 S.E.2d 155 (Hodges v. Cay Economy Plan, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the present case the defendants’ general demurrer to the petition was overruled and no exception was taken to such judgment. While the petition was thereafter amended, the amendment did not materially change the cause of action so as to open the same to demurrer. Davidson v. Consolidated Quarries Corp., 99 Ga. App. 359 (14) (108 SE2d 495); Johnson v. Ellington, 196 Ga. 846 (4) (28 SE2d 114). Therefore such judgment established the law of the case and unless such judgment is reversed the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict if the allegations of the petition are proved. Wilder v. Harrison, 102 Ga. App. 446 (116 SE2d 516). When a court passes upon a motion for a nonsuit it decides only one question, that is, do the allegations and the proof correspond? If a plaintiff proves his case as laid, he is entitled to prevail against a nonsuit. Benton v. Owens, 105 Ga. App. 389 (124 SE2d 756). Since the plaintiff proved the material allega[348]*348tions of its petition, the trial court did not err in disallowing the motion for nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 S.E.2d 155, 107 Ga. App. 347, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-cay-economy-plan-inc-gactapp-1963.