Hodges v. Buckeye Cellulose Corp.

202 So. 2d 103
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1967·No. No. I-402·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the decree of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Carolina Lumber Company v. Daniel (Fla.App.1957) 97 So.2d 156; Meola v. Sparks, 138 Fla. 364, 189 So. 408.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges v. Buckeye Cellulose Corp., 202 So. 2d 103 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

202 So. 2d 103 (Hodges v. Buckeye Cellulose Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Groover v. Adiv Holding Company
202 So. 2d 103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)