Hodges v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hodges v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE

279 So. 2d 266

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided May 30, 1973·No. No. 12116·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

This is a companion suit to McDonald v. Osborne et al., La.App., 279 So.2d 263, decided this day. The two suits were consolidated for trial in the district court and judgments rendered in both cases rejecting plaintiffs’ demands against the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company.

For the reasons assigned in McDonald v. Osborne et al, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

This is a companion suit to McDonald v. Osborne et al., La.App., 279 So.2d 263, decided this day. The two suits were consolidated for trial in the district court and judgments rendered in both cases rejecting plaintiffs’ demands against the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company.

For the reasons assigned in McDonald v. Osborne et al, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.

Hodges v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE, 279 So. 2d 266 (La. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

279 So. 2d 266 (Hodges v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related