Hodges v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hodges v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE

279 So. 2d 266

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 30, 1973

DocketNo. 12116

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 So. 2d 266 (Hodges v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hodges v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE, 279 So. 2d 266 (La. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

This is a companion suit to McDonald v. Osborne et al., La.App., 279 So.2d 263, decided this day. The two suits were consolidated for trial in the district court and judgments rendered in both cases rejecting plaintiffs’ demands against the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company.

For the reasons assigned in McDonald v. Osborne et al, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

This is a companion suit to McDonald v. Osborne et al., La.App., 279 So.2d 263, decided this day. The two suits were consolidated for trial in the district court and judgments rendered in both cases rejecting plaintiffs’ demands against the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company.

For the reasons assigned in McDonald v. Osborne et al, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 So. 2d 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-allstate-insurance-lactapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack