Hodgen v. Burnup & Sims Engineering
This text of 420 So. 2d 885 (Hodgen v. Burnup & Sims Engineering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Keith Berkly HODGEN, Deceased Employee; Margaret Hodgen, Individually, and As Mother and Natural Guardian of the Minor Children, Appellants,
v.
BURNUP & SIMS ENGINEERING and Crawford & Company, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*886 James D. Henry of Harris, Barrett & Dew, St. Petersburg, for appellants.
Richard G. Davis of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellees.
MILLS, Judge.
In this workers' compensation appeal, Mrs. Hodgen contends that her husband's fatal heart attack should have been compensable as an occupational disease pursuant to Section 440.151, Florida Statutes (1981). We decline to follow that line of reasoning and affirm.
Though there was evidence that Mr. Hodgen had undergone some unusual emotional stress, there was no evidence that the heart attack was due to any unusual physical exertion. Emotional strain alone is not sufficient to establish a causal connection between employment and heart failure. Richard E. Mosca & Co., Inc. v. Mosca, 362 So.2d 1340 (Fla. 1978); City of Miami v. Rosenberg, 396 So.2d 163 (Fla. 1981).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 So. 2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgen-v-burnup-sims-engineering-fladistctapp-1982.