Hodge v. Till

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hodge v. Till

41 S.E. 566, 115 Ga. 457, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 446

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 30, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 566 (Hodge v. Till) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hodge v. Till, 41 S.E. 566, 115 Ga. 457, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 446 (Ga. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

.■Little, J.

There being no complaint of the instructions actually given to the jury, and the failure of the court to charge certain propositions set forth in the motion for a new trial not being erroneous, the special grounds of that motion are without merit. This being so, and the verdict being fully warranted by the evidence, the judgment below will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

.■Little, J.

There being no complaint of the instructions actually given to the jury, and the failure of the court to charge certain propositions set forth in the motion for a new trial not being erroneous, the special grounds of that motion are without merit. This being so, and the verdict being fully warranted by the evidence, the judgment below will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 S.E. 566, 115 Ga. 457, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodge-v-till-ga-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack