Hodge v. Till
41 S.E. 566, 115 Ga. 457, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 446
Opinion
There being no complaint of the instructions actually given to the jury, and the failure of the court to charge certain propositions set forth in the motion for a new trial not being erroneous, the special grounds of that motion are without merit. This being so, and the verdict being fully warranted by the evidence, the judgment below will not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hodge v. Till, 41 S.E. 566, 115 Ga. 457, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 446 (Ga. 1902).
41 S.E. 566 (Hodge v. Till) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Augusta Southern Railroad v. Snider
44 S.E. 1005 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)