Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Hodge v. State

Hodge v. State

760 So. 2d 146, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1223, 2000 WL 766493
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 2000
DocketNo. SC94180
StatusPublished

This text of 760 So. 2d 146 (Hodge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodge v. State, 760 So. 2d 146, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1223, 2000 WL 766493 (Fla. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision of Hodge v. State, 718 So.2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal cited as controlling authority its decision in Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved sub nom. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We recently determined in Maddox that unpreserved errors in the assessment of costs cannot be raised on direct appeal as fundamental error. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jollie v. State
405 So. 2d 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Hyden v. State
715 So. 2d 960 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Hodge v. State
718 So. 2d 832 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Maddox v. State
760 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
760 So. 2d 146, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1223, 2000 WL 766493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodge-v-state-fla-2000.