Hodge v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Hodge v. State

760 So. 2d 146, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1223, 2000 WL 766493

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 2000·No. No. SC94180·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision of Hodge v. State, 718 So.2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal cited as controlling authority its decision in Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved sub nom. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We recently determined in Maddox that unpreserved errors in the assessment of costs cannot be raised on direct appeal as fundamental error. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision of Hodge v. State, 718 So.2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal cited as controlling authority its decision in Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved sub nom. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We recently determined in Maddox that unpreserved errors in the assessment of costs cannot be raised on direct appeal as fundamental error. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Hodge v. State, 760 So. 2d 146, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1223, 2000 WL 766493 (Fla. 2000).

Pincite

760 So. 2d 146 (Hodge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related