Hodge v. Moor

1 N.C. 15

This text of 1 N.C. 15 (Hodge v. Moor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodge v. Moor, 1 N.C. 15 (circtnc 1793).

Opinion

Doderidge, J.

If one contracts with I. S. that if he goes to Rome and returns safe, he will pay him £. 20 two months after his return, then I. S. ought to give notice. Otherwise a great inconvenience would ensue. For he might return in some port in this country and conceal himself, so that the other could not take notice of his return.

Jones, J.

agreed on the main question. But he said, that in this case, the plea is that the party suit ad hoc requisitus, and the request implies notice of the marriage, because he demands the money on account of the marriage.

And the court agreed, that the request was a sufficient notice, and adjour natur. Postea 97. Poph. 164, 3 Cr. 90. Roll. 461 and 468,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodge-v-moor-circtnc-1793.