Hodge v. Hodge

188 So. 2d 240, 1966 Miss. LEXIS 1373
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 1966·No. No. 43977·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR

ROBERTSON, Justice:

The appellant, Dovie Mae Hodge, has suggested clarification of our opinion affirming the judgment of the Chancery Court of the Second Judicial District of Jones County on direct appeal wherein the Chancellor has held that “the said Dovie Mae Hodge shall carry all three of said children-to church at 11:00 a. m. on each Sunday.”

We think that our opinion is clear on this-point. Nevertheless, we will try again to restate our position. We feel that it is-certainly to the best interests of these three children to receive regular and systematic spiritual training each week, but we do not approve the decree of the Chancellor in mandatorily requiring that all three of said children be carried to church at eleven-o’clock a. m. on each Sunday.

We treated this portion of the Decree as a suggestion only. We reiterate that both the mother and father should be vitally interested in seeing that their children get regular and systematic spiritual training.. Whether it be by attending Sunday School [241]*241each Sunday or Church or both is for the parents alone to decide.

The suggestion of error, therefore, is overruled.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., and RODGERS, PATTERSON and SMITH, JJ., concur.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodge v. Hodge, 188 So. 2d 240, 1966 Miss. LEXIS 1373 (Mich. 1966).

188 So. 2d 240 (Hodge v. Hodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schlieve v. Schlieve
2014 ND 107 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2014)
Davidson v. Coit
899 So. 2d 904 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2005)
McLemore v. McLemore
762 So. 2d 316 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2000)
Anita Minor McLemore v. Carl D. McLemore
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1998