Hodge v. Hodge

376 P.2d 822, 190 Kan. 492, 1962 Kan. LEXIS 426
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedDecember 8, 1962
Docket42,833
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 376 P.2d 822 (Hodge v. Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodge v. Hodge, 376 P.2d 822, 190 Kan. 492, 1962 Kan. LEXIS 426 (kan 1962).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal in a divorce proceedings. In a previous appearance of this case before the supreme court (Hodge v. Hodge, 186 Kan. 361, 349 P. 2d 947) the trial court was affirmed in its order overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition.

When our present case was ready for trial in the eighteenth judicial district, Sedgwick county, the assignment judge thereof proceeded to assign the trial of the cause to another judge of that judicial district. Plaintiff’s counsel sought a change of venue for the reason that he and the trial judge had had differences and he believed he would not be able to obtain a fair and impartial trial for his client. Counsel requested the assignment judge either to pass the case or assign it to another division of the district court for trial. The assignment judge announced to plaintiff’s counsel that the case had been regularly assigned for trial and it should be tried by the judge of the assigned division or the case could be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff’s counsel orally moved for dismissal of the *493 case without prejudice and it was so dismissed by the assignment judge at the cost of the plaintiff. This appeal was perfected from the trial court’s order of dismissal of the action without prejudice.

The record shows another lawsuit was then filed and is now pending between the same parties covering the same subject matter in the same district court.

We have considered the record in its entirety and in our opinion the order appealed from was not a final order under G. S. 1949, 60-3303, and there is nothing here for appellate review.

The appeal, therefore, is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Perez
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2017
Arnold v. Hewitt
85 P.3d 220 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2004)
Bain v. Artzer
25 P.3d 136 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2001)
Brower Ex Rel. McKinney v. Bartal
990 P.2d 1235 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1999)
Hodge v. Hodge
381 P.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 P.2d 822, 190 Kan. 492, 1962 Kan. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodge-v-hodge-kan-1962.