Hodge v. Hodge

607 So. 2d 510, 1992 WL 332661
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 13, 1992
Docket92-1214
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 607 So. 2d 510 (Hodge v. Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodge v. Hodge, 607 So. 2d 510, 1992 WL 332661 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

607 So.2d 510 (1992)

Cynthia HODGE, Appellant,
v.
G. Byron HODGE, Appellee.

No. 92-1214.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 13, 1992.

*511 Tanya M. Plaut of Law Offices of Tanya M. Plaut, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Paul D. Newnum of Giles & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

COBB, Judge.

The appellant, Cynthia Hodge, appeals the amount awarded by the trial court in regard to temporary alimony and attorney's fees.

As to temporary alimony, we find there was clear evidence from which the trial court could have based an award of $3,000.00 per month. However, the temporary award should have been made retroactive to the time when the petition for such temporary assistance was filed since it appears that the needs existed and the husband had the ability to pay continuously since the time of filing. Alford v. Alford, 594 So.2d 843, 844 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Witcher v. Petty, 534 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Perdue v. Perdue, 506 So.2d 72, 73 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Additionally, we hold that the trial court did not err in awarding the appellant $5,000.00 in temporary attorney's fees pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes (1991). Chapter 61 specifically allows a party to seek attorney's fees, suit money, and costs from time to time as is necessary during proceedings under this chapter. Nichols v. Nichols, 519 So.2d 620 (Fla. 1988).

Accordingly, the order on temporary matters is reversed to the extent that the trial court, on remand, is instructed to make the award of temporary alimony retroactive to the date of filing the counterpetition. In all other respects the order is affirmed.

REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

COWART and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buoniconti v. Buoniconti
36 So. 3d 154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Alpert v. Alpert
886 So. 2d 999 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Schellhammer v. Schellhammer
687 So. 2d 987 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
607 So. 2d 510, 1992 WL 332661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodge-v-hodge-fladistctapp-1992.