Hodge v. Board of County Commissioners
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Harold H. Hodge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hodge v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs, No. 8:10-cv-02396-RWT, 2010 WL 4068793 (D. Md. filed Oct. 14, 2010 & entered Oct. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
414 F. App'x 567 (Hodge v. Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.