Hodge, Gregory Dewayne

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 1, 2009
DocketWR-71,670-01
StatusPublished

This text of Hodge, Gregory Dewayne (Hodge, Gregory Dewayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodge, Gregory Dewayne, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-71,670-01
EX PARTE GREGORY DEWAYNE HODGE, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 22576-A IN THE 3RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded no contest to aggravated assault of a correctional officer, and was sentenced to fifteen years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to invoke Applicant's right to a speedy trial. According to Applicant, the eighteen-month delay between his offense and his plea resulted in one of his witnesses being released, and another witness being "harassed" into changing his story. Applicant alleges that counsel failed to seek out or obtain statements from other witnesses, and failed to investigate the issue of self defense. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the counsel investigated the possibility that Applicant acted in self defense, and whether counsel sought out potential witnesses. The trial court shall make findings as to whether the period of time between the offense and the plea led to the loss of potential defense witnesses, and if so, whether counsel invoked Applicant's right to a speedy trial. The trial court shall make findings as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: April 1, 2009

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Lemke
13 S.W.3d 791 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hodge, Gregory Dewayne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodge-gregory-dewayne-texcrimapp-2009.