Hodesh v. Korelitz

894 N.E.2d 331, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1471
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 1, 2008
Docket2008-1133
StatusPublished

This text of 894 N.E.2d 331 (Hodesh v. Korelitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodesh v. Korelitz, 894 N.E.2d 331, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Hamilton App. Nos. C-061013, C-061040, C-070168, and C-070172, 2008-0hio-2052. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 N.E.2d 331, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodesh-v-korelitz-ohio-2008.