Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hodes v. Helman

Hodes v. Helman

19 A.D.2d 603, 240 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3618
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 13, 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 603 (Hodes v. Helman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodes v. Helman, 19 A.D.2d 603, 240 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

Petition under article 78 in the nature of a writ of prohibition unanimously dismissed, without costs. Prohibition does not lie to prevent the taking of testimony where the court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and alleged errors in the reception of testimony may be remedied by way of [604]*604appeal, and where no extreme necessity is shown (Matter of City of New York v. Maltbie, 248 App. Div. 36, affid. 274 N. Y. 464). Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Bastow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of City of New York v. Maltbie
8 N.E.2d 605 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
City of New York v. Maltbie
248 A.D. 36 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.2d 603, 240 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodes-v-helman-nyappdiv-1963.