Hoda v. State of Florida
This text of Hoda v. State of Florida (Hoda v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-0251 _____________________________
AARON HODA,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceedings.
June 25, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the lower tribunal has ruled on Petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022); Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
LEWIS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Aaron Hoda, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hoda v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoda-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.