Hockney v. PCS Phosphate Corp.

353 F. App'x 788
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 1, 2009·No. No. 09-1624·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn I. Hockney appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Hockney’s civil action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hockney v. PCS Phos[789] phate Corp., No. 4:08-cv-00210-BR (E.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). We deny Hockney’s motion to provide relief and prevent serious wrong and motions to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hockney v. PCS Phosphate Corp., 353 F. App'x 788 (3d Cir. 2009).

353 F. App'x 788 (Hockney v. PCS Phosphate Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.