Hockley v. Wilson
70 F.2d 108, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4077
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 1934·No. No. 3586·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
For the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Chesnut in the District Court, Pyrites Co., Inc., v. Davison Chemical Co., 4 F. Supp. [109]*109294, it is held that compensation awards in Maryland under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 US CA 901 et seq.) are entitled to preference against the employer without limit of amount, and the decree of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hockley v. Wilson, 70 F.2d 108, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4077 (4th Cir. 1934).
70 F.2d 108 (Hockley v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Myers v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
170 F. Supp. 693 (D. Maryland, 1959)
In Re Davison Chemical Co.
14 F. Supp. 821 (D. Maryland, 1936)
Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. Lowe
14 F. Supp. 280 (S.D. New York, 1936)
Atlantic Coast Shipping Co. v. Golubiewski
9 F. Supp. 315 (D. Maryland, 1934)